SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Jonathan Mutuku Maingi v Davetronics Company Limited [2020] KEBPRT 58 (KLR)

[2020] KEBPRT 58 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
58
Citation
[2020] KEBPRT 58 (KLR)
Decided
4 June 2020
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLandlord and Tenant DisputePostureReference filed by Tenant, Respondent filed a counter-applicationCoramMBICHI MBOROKI, CHAIRMAN, BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
Holding

The Tribunal cannot conclusively determine the Landlord and Tenant relationship without oral evidence, but the status quo should be maintained, and the Tenant/Applicant is ordered to pay arrears of rent on or before 30th June 2020.

Facts

Tenant/Applicant claims to have bought the business and tenancy interests of the Landlord's Tenant, while Landlord maintains the Tenant is a stranger. The Landlord disputes the existence of a Landlord and Tenant relationship.

Issues

  1. Whether there is a Landlord and Tenant relationship between the Tenant/Applicant and the Landlord

Reasoning

The Tribunal notes that the Tenant is not a party to the reference, there is no written consent from the Landlord's authority, and the business license is in the name of a different entity.

Outcome

The Landlord's application is dismissed with no order as to costs, and the Tenant/Applicant is ordered to pay arrears of rent.

Orders

  • Maintain status quo pending determination of reference
  • Order Tenant/Applicant to pay arrears of rent on or before 30th June 2020
  • Order Landlord to accept payment on without prejudice basis
  • Order Tenant/Applicant to pay all arrears of rent on or before 30th June 2020
  • Order Landlord to levy distress if Tenant/Applicant fails to pay arrears
  • Extend interim orders issued on 17th February 2020

Remedies

  • Payment of arrears of rent
  • Levying of distress

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Distress for Rent Act Cap 293
  • Cap 301
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case