SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Susan Watheru Kimemia t/a Brimier Star Caterers v Martin Karanja & another [2021] KEBPRT 105 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 105 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
105
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 105 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeBusiness Premises Rent TribunalPostureApplication for restraining orders against termination of tenancyCoramHON. GAKUHI CHEGE, J.M. Njenga for Tenant/Applicant, Kibathi for the Landlord
Holding

The application is granted, and the tenant is ordered to continue paying rent pending the hearing and determination of the reference.

Facts

The tenant, Susan Watheru Kimemia, runs a catering business in the landlord's premises. The landlord demanded Kshs.120,000 as goodwill and failed to carry out agreed repairs. The tenant claims the termination was illegal and in bad faith due to business losses and unfair competition.

Issues

  1. Whether the landlord's notice for termination was valid
  2. Whether the tenant's business should be protected from termination

Reasoning

The court found the landlord's notice was not in the prescribed form and did not give the required minimum period of notice. The court held that the tenant's business should be protected from termination due to the illegality of the notice.

Outcome

Application granted

Orders

  • The application dated 24th March 2021 is granted in terms of prayers 2 and 4 thereof
  • The applicant shall continue paying rent in respect of the suit premises pending hearing and determination of the reference
  • The costs of the application are granted to the applicant

Remedies

  • Continuation of the tenant's business in the premises pending the hearing and determination of the reference

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Thomson Smith Aikman & others – vs- Muchoki & Others (1982) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case