SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Credit Traders Ltd v Joseph Kipkemoi Chebet [2021] KEBPRT 110 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 110 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
110
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 110 (KLR)
Decided
30 November 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLandlord and Tenant DisputePostureAppeal from a decision of the Business Premises Rent TribunalCoramHON A. MUMA, VICE CHAIR, BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
Holding

The Tribunal ordered the Landlord to increase the monthly rent to Kshs 70,000 from 1st December 2021 and allowed the Landlord to issue a notice to terminate the tenancy.

Facts

The Tenant, Kenya Credit Traders, rented space from the Landlord, Joseph Kipkemoi Chebet. The Landlord served a notice to terminate the tenancy and increase rent. The Tenant filed a reference opposing the notice. The Tribunal ordered the Tenant to pay the increased rent and allowed the Landlord to issue a notice to terminate the tenancy.

Issues

  1. Whether the Landlord's application to increase rent is lawful?
  2. Whether the Landlord's notice to terminate tenancy is valid?

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that increasing rent qualifies as an alteration to the agreement and should be communicated through a valid notice, not an application.

Outcome

The Landlord's application to increase rent and terminate tenancy was upheld.

Orders

  • The landlord shall increase the monthly rent payable by the Tenant with effect from 1st December 2021 to Kshs 70,000/-.
  • The Landlord shall be at liberty to issue a notice to terminate tenancy in the prescribed format when ready to do so.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act Chapter 301 Laws of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case