Sayed Abdul Satar v Sharrifa Said Abdulrehman & another [2021] KEBPRT 135 (KLR)
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Case number
- 135
- Citation
- [2021] KEBPRT 135 (KLR)
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeBusiness Premises Rent TribunalPostureRespondent's notice of preliminary objection dismissedCoramHON CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI
Holding
The Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the dispute as the tenancy is a controlled tenancy.
Facts
The parties have a lease agreement for a period of five years and three months, which is a controlled tenancy under section 2(1) of Cap 301.
Issues
- Whether the tenancy is a controlled tenancy
- Jurisdiction of the Tribunal to hear the dispute
Reasoning
The lease agreement is for a period of five years and three months, which falls under the definition of a controlled tenancy as per section 2(1) of Cap 301.
Outcome
The Respondent's notice of preliminary objection is dismissed with costs to the Tenant.
Orders
- Application dated 8th June 2021 will proceed by way of written submissions
- Matter be mentioned on 16th December 2021
- Interim orders are extended
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…