SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

George Mwangi v Duncan N. Njau & another [2021] KEBPRT 145 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 145 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
145
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 145 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeRuling on Notice to VacatePostureRuling on Application for Restraining Order and Rent ArrearsCoramHON A. MUMA
Holding

The notice to vacate is declared valid, and the Tenant is ordered to vacate the premises with immediate effect. The Tenant's claim for Kshs. 10,380.00 is dismissed, and the Tenant is ordered to pay arrears of Kshs. 21,000.

Facts

The Tenant, George Mwangi, rented a commercial premises on Parcel Title No. Subukia/Subukia Block 13/404 adjacent to Nakuru-Nyahururu Road. The Landlord, Duncan N. Njau, issued a Notice to Vacate the premises on 4th June 2021, citing KENHA's demolition notice. The Tenant sought restraining orders and rent deductions.

Issues

  1. Validity of the Notice to Vacate
  2. Arrears and Rent Deduction

Reasoning

The notice to vacate was not in the prescribed form but was considered valid due to the substance of the notice. The Tenant's claim for repair and renovation costs was dismissed.

Outcome

The Tenant is ordered to vacate the premises and pay arrears.

Orders

  • Notice to vacate dated 4th June 2021 and KENHA notice declared valid
  • Tenant to vacate the premises with immediate effect
  • Tenant to pay arrears of Kshs. 21,000
  • Tenant to pay Kshs. 10,380.00 for repair and renovation costs (dismissed)
  • OCS Subukia Police Station to aid in execution of orders
  • Each party to bear their own costs

Remedies

  • Vacation of premises
  • Payment of arrears

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act Cap 301 Laws of Kenya
  • Interpretation and General Provisions Act Cap 2 Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • Oscar Luvaha (Explore Auto Valuers and Assessories Limited) v Babi Investments & another [2021] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case