SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Miriam Nyawira Mwaniki v Cyrus Wanjohi Kamunya [2021] KEBPRT 216 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 216 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
216
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 216 (KLR)
Decided
28 September 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureApplication for Mandatory InjunctionCoramHON. GAKUHI CHEGE, VICE CHAIR, BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
Holding

The Landlady has failed to bring herself within the principles for the grant of the orders sought and the application is dismissed.

Facts

The Landlady (Applicant) and Tenant (Respondent) have a long-standing relationship, with the Respondent paying rent through the Landlady's daughter. The Respondent made alterations to the premises, including relocating a bathroom and toilet, which led to a closure notice from the Ministry of Health. The Tenant applied for and received a lifting of the closure notice, but the Landlady disputes the payment of rent and seeks to terminate the tenancy.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent is entitled to alter the structures of the building
  2. Whether the Landlady can terminate the tenancy

Reasoning

The court found that the Respondent is a tenant and has been dealing with the Landlady's daughter for rent payments. The closure of the business premises was due to health concerns, and the Tenant's alterations did not interfere with the structural foundation. The Landlady's claims of rent non-payment and purported sale of the property were not supported.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Physical Planning Act
  • Cap. 301 Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (1)
  • Halsburry’s Laws of England 4th Edn, paragraph 948
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case