SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Paul Mwangi Warutere v Ligi Ndogo Limited [2021] KEBPRT 296 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 296 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
296
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 296 (KLR)
Decided
13 September 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal DecisionPostureApplication for restraining orders grantedCoramHON. GAKUHI CHEGE, VICE CHAIR
Holding

The tenant is still a tenant of the landlord and the landlord's attempt to treat him otherwise is illegal, null, and void. The risk of a party suffering an illegality in the face of a threatened eviction amounts to irreparable loss and damage.

Facts

The tenant, Paul Mwangi Warutere, occupied the suit premises as a tenant of the landlord, Ligi Ndogo Limited, when it was vacant. The landlord instructed Bealine Kenya Auctioneers to levy distress for rent against the tenant, leading to the attachment and auction of 5 shipping containers and 2 water tanks. The tenant filed a further affidavit denying knowledge of the auction and claiming to be still a tenant.

Issues

  1. Whether the tenant is entitled to a temporary injunction
  2. Who is liable to pay costs

Reasoning

The court held that the landlord's actions were illegal and that the tenant had established a prima facie case with a probability of success. The balance of convenience tilts heavily in favor of maintaining the landlord-tenant relationship.

Outcome

The application for restraining orders is allowed in terms of prayers 3 and 4.

Orders

  • The applicant shall get costs of the application against the Respondent.

Remedies

  • Temporary injunction

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Cap. 301, Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (2)
  • Giella – vs- Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd (1973) EA 358
  • Thomson Smith Alkman, Alan Malloy & others – vs- Muchoki & others (1982) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case