SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Peter Njagi t/a Mwenda Njagi & Company Advocates v Muruga Investments Ltd & another [2021] KEBPRT 389 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 389 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
389
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 389 (KLR)
Decided
3 August 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeBusiness Premises Rent TribunalPosturePreliminary Objection to JurisdictionCoramHON. CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI
Holding

The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear and determine the dispute as the lease agreement is for a period of 5 years and 3 months, which is outside the jurisdiction of the Tribunal.

Facts

The tenant and landlord entered into a lease agreement dated 9th May 2019 for a period of 5 years and 3 months. The tenant claims the tenancy is a controlled tenancy, while the landlord disputes this.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the Tribunal
  2. Nature of the lease agreement

Reasoning

The lease agreement is for a period of 5 years and 3 months, which exceeds the jurisdiction limit of the Tribunal. The lease is not in writing and does not contain a clause for termination within five years from the commencement thereof.

Outcome

The Landlord’s notice of preliminary objection is allowed with costs to the Landlord.

Orders

  • Jurisdiction of the Tribunal is limited to controlled tenancies
  • The lease agreement is not a controlled tenancy

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act
  • Evidence Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case