SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Antony Mageria t/a Kahuthu and Company Advocates v Prestige Management Valuers Ltd [2021] KEBPRT 424 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 424 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
424
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 424 (KLR)
Decided
13 July 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLandlord and Tenant DisputePostureTenant's Application to Investigate Complaint and Seek InjunctionsCoramHON. A. MUMA, VICE CHAIR, BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
Holding

The tribunal lacks jurisdiction to investigate the complaint and dismisses the tenant's application.

Facts

The tenant, Antony Mageria, rented space from the landlord, New Bibirioni Investment Ltd, under a lease agreement dated 9th May 2017. The tenant moved a reference to the Business Premises and Rent Tribunal on 4th December 2019, seeking protection from illegal threats of distress and coercive rent increases.

Issues

  1. Tribunal's jurisdiction under section 12 of the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act
  2. Whether the tenancy agreement is a controlled tenancy

Reasoning

The tribunal's jurisdiction is limited to controlled tenancies for a period not exceeding five years. The tenancy agreement in this case is for five years and three months, and does not meet the criteria for a controlled tenancy.

Outcome

Tenant's application dismissed, reference effectively compromised and dismissed.

Orders

  • Tenant's Application dated 4th December 2019 is hereby dismissed.
  • Reference by the Tenant dated 4th December 2019 is effectively compromised and stands dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, Cap 301
Cases cited (2)
  • Owners of Motor Vessel Lillian S -vs- Caltex Kenya 1989 eKLR
  • In the Matter of Advisory Opinion of the Supreme Court, Constitutional Application No. 2 of 2011
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case