SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Christine Nkirote Kimbui v Izudom Ali [2021] KEBPRT 442 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 442 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
442
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 442 (KLR)
Decided
18 June 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal DecisionPostureTenant's Application for Restraining Order vs Landlord's Application for Stay and Payment of Rent ArrearsCoramHON. GAKUHI CHEGE, VICE CHAIR, BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
Holding

The Tenant's application for restraining order is allowed, and the Landlord's application for stay and payment of rent arrears is dismissed.

Facts

The Tenant sought a restraining order against the Landlord to prevent eviction, while the Landlord sought a stay of the restraining order and payment of rent arrears. The Tenant feared forcible eviction and claimed she was issued with an illegal notice of eviction, while the Landlord argued the Tenant owed rent arrears and had disappeared from the premises.

Issues

  1. Whether the Tenant's application for restraining order should be granted
  2. Whether the Landlord's application for stay and payment of rent arrears should be granted

Reasoning

The court found the Tenant's application justified due to the illegal notice of eviction and the Landlord's failure to disclose the existence of an earlier order.

Outcome

Tenant's application for restraining order is allowed, and Landlord's application for stay and payment of rent arrears is dismissed.

Orders

  • Tenant's application for restraining order is allowed
  • Landlord's application for stay and payment of rent arrears is dismissed

Remedies

  • Tenant's application for restraining order is allowed
  • Tenant is ordered to pay costs of both applications
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case