SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mohamed Samir Asgar v Muktagauir Patel [2021] KEBPRT 461 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 461 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
461
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 461 (KLR)
Decided
11 June 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal DecisionPostureAppeal from an earlier orderCoramHON. ANDREW MUMA, HON. A. MUMA
Holding

The Landlord’s actions for distress for rent were unlawful due to lack of notice and non-compliance with statutory procedures. The Landlord is not entitled to the orders sought.

Facts

The Tenant, Mohammed Samir Asgar, rented shop space to the Landlord, Muktagauir Patel. The Landlord unlawfully barricaded the entrance to the suit premises on the pretext of rental arrears without prior notice. The Tenant moved the court for an injunction to restrain the Landlord from interfering with his quiet possession and from attaching or selling his property.

Issues

  1. Whether the Landlord unlawfully levied distress against the tenant
  2. Whether the Landlord is entitled to the orders sought

Reasoning

The Landlord did not comply with the Distress for Rent Act and the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishment) Act. The Court found the Landlord’s actions to be unlawful and granted remedies to the Tenant.

Outcome

The Landlord is ordered to grant the Tenant access to the suit premises and remove any form of obstructions for quiet enjoyment of the premises by the Tenant. The Tenant is ordered to pay rent for the month of December 2019 only and thereafter continue to pay rent as per the Tenancy agreement upon re-entering the suit premises.

Orders

  • An injunction is hereby issued restraining the Landlord, jointly and severally by themselves and/or through its agents, servants and employees or otherwise from proclamation, attachment and/or sale of the Applicant’s tools of trade.
  • The Landlord is hereby ordered to grant the Tenant access to the suit premises and remove any form of obstructions for quiet enjoyment of the premises by the Tenant.
  • Tenant to pay rent for the month of December 2019 only and thereafter continue to pay rent as per the Tenancy agreement upon re-entering the suit premises.

Remedies

  • Access to the suit premises
  • Removal of obstructions
  • Payment of rent

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Distress for Rent Act Cap 293
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishment) Act Cap 301
Cases cited (5)
  • Gusii Mwalimu Investment Company Ltd vs Mwalim Hotel Kisii Limited CA Civil Appeal no. 160 of 1995
  • Caledonia Supermarket Ltd vs Kenya National Examinations Council [2000]
  • Kyangaro v. Kenya Commercial Bank ltd & another [2004]
  • Patrick Waweru Mwangi & Another v Housing Finance Co. of Kenya Ltd [2013]
  • Giella vs Cassman Brown and Co. Ltd
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case