SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Hawi and Hera Beauty Salon v Avenue House Limited [2021] KEBPRT 53 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 53 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
53
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 53 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureApplication for Permanent InjunctionCoramMadan
Holding

The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear the case.

Facts

The tenant, Hawi and Hera Beauty Salon, sought a permanent injunction against the landlord, Avenue House Limited, to restrain the landlord from demanding an impugned rent increment and threatening to evict the tenant. The tenant claimed the rent was illegally increased from Kshs.84,000 to Kshs.100,780 without due process.

Issues

  1. Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the case.
  2. Whether the tenant is entitled to the orders sought.
  3. Who is liable to pay costs of the suit.

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that there was a written lease agreement dated 13 March 2018 between the landlord and the tenant, which created a controlled tenancy. The Tribunal held that the existence of the lease agreement is a pre-requisite for the application of the Act and without it, the Tribunal has no jurisdiction.

Outcome

The orders given were made without jurisdiction.

Orders

  • Permanent injunction to restrain the landlord from demanding the impugned rent increment and threatening to evict the tenant.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Republic vs The Chairperson, the business premises Rent Tribunal at Nairobi & another ex-parte Suraj Housing Properties and Co. Ltd (2016) eKLR
  • Pritam vs Ratilal and Another (1972) EA 560
  • Owners of Motor Vessel Lilian's vs Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd (1989) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case