SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Railways Workers Union (K) v Nicholas T.T. Simuyu t/a Foundation Professional Limited [2021] KEBPRT 641 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 641 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
641
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 641 (KLR)
Decided
22 April 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeBusiness Premises Rent TribunalPostureApplication for orders to break into premises and sell goods to recover rentCoramHON. CYPRIAN MUGAMBI NGUTHARI, HON GAKUHI CHEGE
Holding

The Tribunal allows the Landlord to break into the Tenant's premises to distress for rent and sell any distrainable goods to recover outstanding rent arrears, with the auctioneer taking an inventory and rendering an account to the Tribunal within seven days.

Facts

The Landlord (Railways Workers Union) seeks orders to break into the Tenant's (Foundation Professional Limited) business premises to distress for rent and sell any distrainable goods to recover outstanding rent arrears.

Issues

  1. Right of the Landlord to break into the Tenant's premises to distress for rent
  2. Procedure for selling distrainable goods and rendering accounts

Reasoning

The Tribunal satisfied that the Tenant has been properly served and that the Landlord has the right to distress for rent under the circumstances.

Outcome

The Landlord is allowed to break into the Tenant's premises and distress for rent, and to sell any distrainable goods to recover rent arrears.

Orders

  • Landlord is allowed to break into Tenant's premises to distress for rent
  • Inventory of distrained goods to be taken by auctioneer in presence of OCS Kamukunji Police Station
  • Auctioneer to render account of sale to Tribunal within seven days
  • Landlord to have costs of application

Remedies

  • Recovery of outstanding rent arrears through distress and sale of distrainable goods
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case