SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Hurlingham Grocers Limited v APA Insurance Limited (Tribunal Case E355 of 2021) [2021] KEBPRT 79 (KLR) (20 December 2021) (Ruling)

[2021] KEBPRT 79 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
79
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 79 (KLR)
Decided
20 December 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureTenant's application dismissed; Landlord's application allowedCoramHON. GAKUHI CHEGE, VICE CHAIR, BUSINESS PREMISES RENT TRIBUNAL
Holding

There is no existing Landlord/Tenant relationship between the parties, and the suit was incompetent from the date of inception.

Facts

The Tenant and Landlord had a dispute over rent increase, leading to the Tenant abandoning the premises. The Landlord then sold the Tenant's goods by auction and took over the premises.

Issues

  1. Whether there is a Landlord/Tenant relationship in existence between the parties herein

Reasoning

The Landlord sold the Tenant's goods by auction and took over the premises after the Tenant abandoned the suit premises, thus no Landlord/Tenant relationship existed.

Outcome

The application dated 28th July 2021 is hereby dismissed as well as the reference. The orders given ex-parte on 29th July 2021 are hereby discharged and vacated. The Landlord's application dated 3rd September 2021 is allowed in terms of order (b) above. Costs of the two applications and the reference assessed at Kshs 50,000/- are awarded to the Landlord.

Orders

  • The application dated 28th July 2021 is hereby dismissed as well as the reference.
  • The orders given ex-parte on 29th July 2021 are hereby discharged and vacated.
  • The Landlord's application dated 3rd September 2021 is allowed in terms of order (b) above.

Remedies

  • Costs of the two applications and the reference assessed at Kshs 50,000/- are awarded to the Landlord.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case