SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Orokise Sacco Limited v Godfrey Mwathi Mepukori [p [2021] KEBPRT 90 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 90 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
90
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 90 (KLR)
Decided
16 December 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeLandlord and Tenant DisputePostureAppeal from a ruling dismissing a tenant's reference and applicationCoramHON A. MUMA, Githaiga for the Landlord, Gachugi for Ambani for the Tenant
Holding

The landlord's notice of preliminary objection is upheld, and the tenant's reference and application are dismissed with costs.

Facts

The tenant and landlord entered into a lease agreement for a period of 2 years, from August 2019 to August 2021. The tenant moved the tribunal seeking to prevent eviction and allow rent deposits, while the landlord sought to be restrained from evicting the tenant.

Issues

  1. Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the matter
  2. Whether the tenant's reference and application should be dismissed

Reasoning

The court found that the matter falls under the jurisdiction of the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, and the lease agreement was for a controlled tenancy.

Outcome

The tenant's reference and application are dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The landlord's notice of preliminary objection is upheld
  • The tenant's reference and application are dismissed with costs
  • The tenant shall pay any accrued rent arrears
  • The tenant shall vacate within 45 days

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, Cap 301 Laws of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case