SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Samuel Wanyoike Igecha & another v James Gitau John & 2 others [2021] KEBPRT 94 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 94 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
94
Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 94 (KLR)
Decided
10 December 2021
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeRent TribunalsPostureApplication for injunction and counter-application for relief against distress
Holding

The court found that the tenants are entitled to a temporary prohibitory order against the landlords from levying distress, proclaiming, carting away, and attaching their movable property and goods or auctioning the same. The court also granted an injunction against harassment, intimidation, or interference with the business.

Facts

The tenants, Samuel Wanyoike Igecha and Peter Kagai Theuri, rented a business premises from James Gitau John and Paul Njoroge Ngugi. The landlords, James Gitau John and Paul Njoroge Ngugi, sought to levy distress for rent against the tenants without permission from the Tribunal.

Issues

  1. Whether the tenants are entitled to the reliefs sought in their application
  2. Whether the landlords are entitled to the reliefs claimed in their counter-application
  3. Who is liable to pay costs

Reasoning

The court determined that the tenants are entitled to the reliefs sought in their application because the landlords were proceeding to levy distress without permission from the Tribunal. The court found that the right of the landlord to distress for rent arises at common law and does not require explicit reservation.

Outcome

The court granted the tenants' application for a temporary prohibitory order and injunction.

Orders

  • Temporary prohibitory order against the landlords from levying distress, proclaiming, carting away, and attaching the tenants' movable property and goods or auctioning the same.
  • Injunction against harassment, intimidation, or interference with the business

Remedies

  • Costs to be determined by the court

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Distress for Rent Act, Cap. 293, Laws of Kenya
  • Rent Act, Cap. 301, Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (2)
  • John Nthumbi Kamwithi v Asha Akumu Juma (2018) eKLR
  • Peter Nthenge v Daniel Itumo & Another HCCC No. 1242 of 1974, Nairobi
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case