SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Camp Zodiac Africa Group Limited v Atieno & another (Tribunal Case E154 of 2022) [2023] KEBPRT 1145 (KLR) (22 December 2023) (Ruling)

[2023] KEBPRT 1145 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
1145
Citation
[2023] KEBPRT 1145 (KLR)
Decided
22 December 2023
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureApplication for payment of rent and vacating premisesCoramCN MUGAMBI
Holding

The Landlord's application is not res judicata. The court declines to summon the Landlord for cross examination. The court orders the Tenant to pay rent arrears of Kshs 720,000/=.

Facts

The Landlord seeks orders for payment of rent arrears and vacating the premises, while the Tenant contests the application, claiming the Landlord's application is res judicata and that the Landlord has interfered with the Tenant's ability to use the premises.

Issues

  1. Whether the Landlord's application is res judicata
  2. Whether the Landlord ought to be called for cross examination on the contents of her affidavit
  3. Whether the Landlord is entitled to the orders sought in the application

Reasoning

The court finds the Landlord's application for payment of rent arrears is not barred by res judicata. The court also dismisses the Tenant's contention that the Landlord has interfered with the Tenant's ability to use the premises, as the Tenant has not produced evidence of such interference.

Outcome

The Tenant is ordered to pay rent arrears of Kshs 720,000/=

Orders

  • Order for payment of rent arrears of Kshs 720,000/=

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Cap 301
Cases cited (1)
  • GGR v H.P.S (2012) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case