SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Onsomu v Gatati (Tribunal Case E096 of 2024) [2024] KEBPRT 531 (KLR) (3 May 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEBPRT 531 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
531
Citation
[2024] KEBPRT 531 (KLR)
Decided
3 May 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureTenant's Application for Interlocutory ReliefCoramP. KITUR
Holding

The Tenant's Application succeeds in re-opening the Tenant's Business Premises, returning seized items, and exempting the Tenant from paying rent from 9th January 2024.

Facts

The Tenant filed a Complaint and Notice of Motion Application alleging that the Landlord unlawfully sent people to the premises to break in and carry away some of his tools of trade. The Tenant also claimed the Landlord failed to comply with the Landlords and Tenant (Shops, Hotels, Catering Establishments) Act, Cap 301 in levying the distress for rent.

Issues

  1. Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to determine this matter.
  2. Whether the Tenant has been unlawfully rid of the business premise and therefore entitled to the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The Tribunal has jurisdiction as the Landlord failed to comply with the Landlords and Tenant (Shops, Hotels, Catering Establishments) Act, Cap 301, and the Tenant was unlawfully evicted.

Outcome

Tenant's Application granted

Orders

  • Re-opening of Tenant's Business Premises
  • Return of seized items
  • Exemption from paying rent
  • Compensation for loss of equipment
  • Costs awarded to Tenant

Remedies

  • Re-opening of premises
  • Return of seized items
  • Exemption from paying rent
  • Compensation for loss of equipment

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Landlords and Tenant (Shops, Hotels, Catering Establishments) Act, Cap 301
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case