SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Weda v Anam & another (Tribunal Case 38 of 2018) [2024] KEBPRT 634 (KLR) (26 April 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEBPRT 634 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
634
Citation
[2024] KEBPRT 634 (KLR)
Decided
26 April 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureApplication for review of Tribunal's rulingCoramMuma, Member
Holding

The Tribunal did not find the Tenants' reasons for seeking orders for review to meet the criteria for a review.

Facts

The Landlord and Tenants have a dispute over the handover of the premises and rent payment. The Tenants filed an application seeking a review of the Tribunal's ruling.

Issues

  1. Whether the Tribunal should review its Ruling and orders delivered on 1st February 2023

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that the Tenants' claims do not meet the criteria for a review, as they have not provided sufficient evidence to support their assertions regarding lost net rent and construction costs.

Outcome

The Tribunal upheld the previous ruling and orders.

Orders

  • The Tenants' application for review was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act Cap 21
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
Cases cited (5)
  • Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & 2 others [2018] eKLR
  • Pancras T. Swai v Kenya Breweries Limited [2014] eKLR
  • Zablon Mokua v Solomon M. Choti & 3 others [2016] eKLR
  • Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & Ano. v Stephen Mutinda Mule & 3 others [2014] eKLR
  • Adetoun Oladeji (NIG) v Nigeria Breweries PLC SC 91/2002
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case