SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Erotekt (Kenya) Limited v Oketch (Tribunal Case E064 of 2023) [2024] KEBPRT 684 (KLR) (5 March 2024) (Ruling)

[2024] KEBPRT 684 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
684
Citation
[2024] KEBPRT 684 (KLR)
Decided
5 March 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeApplication for Stay of ExecutionPostureApplication dismissedCoramHON. NDEGWA WAHOME, MBS
Holding

The Application is dismissed. The Applicant will pay costs assessed at Kshs. 10,000/=

Facts

Erotekt (Kenya) Limited applied for a stay of execution of Hon. Ndegwa Wahome's orders dated 2nd February, 2024, pending the hearing and determination of an intended appeal and the filing of a notice of termination of tenancy dated 4th October, 2023.

Issues

  1. Substantial loss to the Applicant if the orders are not stayed
  2. Compliance of the notice of termination with the Landlord, Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments Act)

Reasoning

The court found that the Applicant's claim of substantial loss was unsubstantiated and that the notice of termination was compliant with the law.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Applicant pays Kshs. 10,000/= in costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Landlord, Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments Act) Cap 301 of the Laws of Kenya
  • Order 42 Rule 6(2) of the Business Premises Rent Tribunal Rules
Cases cited (4)
  • Wilson v Church (No.2) CL.D [1879]
  • National Dry Cleaners Ltd & Another v Ndunge [1978] EKLR
  • BPRT Case No. 43 of 2020
  • Kisumu ELC Court Appeal No. 71 of 2021
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case