SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nyakundi v Mutimba (Tribunal Case E036 of 2024) [2024] KEBPRT 861 (KLR) (18 June 2024) (Judgment)

[2024] KEBPRT 861 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
861
Citation
[2024] KEBPRT 861 (KLR)
Decided
18 June 2024
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeBusiness Premises Rent DisputePostureAppeal from a previous determinationCoramHON. NDEGWA WAHOME, HON. JOYCE MURIGI
Holding

The notice of rent increment dated 3rd April 2024 and the notice of termination of tenancy dated 4th December 2023 are declared illegal and of no legal effect. The Tenant is allowed quiet possession of the demised premises and the Landlord is ordered to pay Kshs.10,000 in costs to the Tenant, to be offset against rent payable.

Facts

The Tenant, Edwin Nyakundi, initiated proceedings against the Landlord, Rasid Mutimba, alleging that the Landlord had unlawfully terminated the tenancy and incrementally raised the rent. The Landlord had issued notices of termination and rent increment, but the Tenant claimed these were not in compliance with the law.

Issues

  1. Whether the Landlord's notice of rent increment was lawful
  2. Whether the Landlord's notice of termination of the tenancy was lawful
  3. Who should bear the costs of the suit

Reasoning

The notices were not compliant with the law as they did not follow the prescribed form and duration as required by the Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act and its regulations.

Outcome

The appeal is allowed, and the Tenant is granted quiet possession of the premises.

Orders

  • The notice of increment of rent dated 3rd April 2024 and the notice of termination of tenancy dated 4th December 2023 are declared illegal and of no legal effect.
  • The Tenant is allowed quiet possession of the demised premises.
  • The Landlord is ordered to pay Kshs.10,000 in costs to the Tenant, to be offset against rent payable.

Remedies

  • Quiet possession of the demised premises for the Tenant

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act (Cap. 301)
  • Regulations to the Act
  • Civil Procedure Act
Cases cited (1)
  • Fredrick Mutua Mulinge T/A Kitui Uniform vs Kitui Teachers Housing Co-operative Society Ltd (2017) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case