SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Nyaata v Nyaoga t/a Monte Carlo Lounge (Tribunal Case E057 of 2024) [2025] KEBPRT 187 (KLR) (Civ) (26 February 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEBPRT 187 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
187
Citation
[2025] KEBPRT 187 (KLR)
Decided
26 February 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureRespondent's application for injunction and arrears payment against the LandlordCoramHON P. KITUR
Holding

The tribunal finds that there was no mutual agreement to offset renovation costs against rent.

Facts

The Tenant and Landlord entered into a tenancy agreement dated October 6, 2020. The Landlord filed an application for a temporary injunction and arrears payment due to rent arrears of Kshs 1,390,000/-.

Issues

  1. Whether the Landlord is entitled to the reliefs sought.
  2. Whether there was a mutual agreement to offset renovation costs against rent

Reasoning

The Tenant failed to produce sufficient evidence to support the alleged agreement to offset renovation costs against rent. The Landlord's claim for rent arrears is upheld.

Outcome

The application is allowed with specific orders for payment of arrears, vacating the premises, and costs awarded to the Landlord.

Orders

  • Injunction restraining the Tenant from removing items, subletting, selling, or disposing of the business premises.
  • Payment of Kshs 1,390,000/- in arrears by 4th March 2025.
  • Handover of vacant possession by 31st March 2025.
  • Award of Kshs 40,000/- in costs to the Landlord.

Remedies

  • Payment of rent arrears
  • Injunction against subletting and selling

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Evidence Act, Sections 107 and 108
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case