SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mochorwa v Muirungi & another (Tribunal Case E393 of 2024) [2025] KEBPRT 198 (KLR) (28 January 2025) (Ruling)

[2025] KEBPRT 198 (KLR) Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Read PDF
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Case number
198
Citation
[2025] KEBPRT 198 (KLR)
Decided
28 January 2025
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeTribunal CasePostureAppeal from a previous decisionCoramP. KITUR
Holding

The Landlord’s Preliminary Objection is upheld, and the Tenant’s Complaint and Application are struck out.

Facts

The Tenant, Nicholas Nyarangi Mochorwa, was a tenant of the Landlord, Nelson Kiogora Muirungi, on the second floor of the suit premises. The tenancy was for five years and three months starting October 1, 2021. The Landlord issued an eviction notice in March 2024 due to non-payment of rent and hotel inventory. The Tenant filed a complaint and an application for interim reliefs, which were partially granted.

Issues

  1. Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter
  2. Whether the suit offends section 2(1)(b) of the Act

Reasoning

Jurisdiction is essential for the court to proceed. The court held that the Landlord’s eviction notice was valid, and the Tenant’s tenancy had ended.

Outcome

The Tenant’s Complaint and Application are struck out.

Orders

  • The Landlord’s Preliminary Objection is upheld
  • The Tenant’s Complaint and Application are struck out
  • Costs awarded to the Landlord at Kshs 20,000/=
  • The file is marked as closed

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Landlord and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act, cap 301
Cases cited (1)
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel “Lillians S” v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd (1989) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case