SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

City Printing Works (Kenya) Ltd v Peter S. Bailey [1977] KECA 18 (KLR)

[1977] KECA 18 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
18
Citation
[1977] KECA 18 (KLR)
Decided
21 April 1977
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Judgment of the High Court (Madan J) Dated 24th June 1976 in Civil Case No. 499 of 1976CoramWambuzi P, Law V-P, Musoke JA
Holding

The appeal is dismissed with costs. The judge had grave doubts about the bona fides of the defendant's new defence and had a discretion to impose conditions. The defendant is granted leave to defend conditionally.

Facts

The plaintiff, Peter S. Bailey, claimed an annual bonus of Shs 24,000 from the defendant, City Printing Works (Kenya) Ltd, based on an agreement made on or about 29th August 1973. The defendant admitted the facts pleaded in the plaint but denied working as a general manager and claimed there was no agreement on gratuity.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendant's application for summary judgment should have been granted
  2. Whether the defendant's new defence in its affidavit was genuine and bona fide

Reasoning

The judge considered the conflicts between the defendant's defence and its affidavit, finding the defendant's bona fides were clouded with strong doubt. He decided to grant conditional leave to defend rather than summarily dismissing the case.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The defendant is granted leave to defend conditionally subject to depositing Shs 24,000 within 20 days or signing judgment as prayed against the defendant together with costs for this application; otherwise costs in the cause claim
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case