SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Amber May v Republic [1979] KECA 6 (KLR)

[1979] KECA 6 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
6
Citation
[1979] KECA 6 (KLR)
Decided
17 December 1979
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal against dismissal by Todd J in the High CourtCoramE.J.E Law, JUDGE OF APPEAL C.H.E Miller, JUDGE OF APPEAL K.D Potter
Holding

The appellant was rightly convicted on all counts.

Facts

The appellant Amber May left Kenya for a holiday in Europe in July 1978 and returned later in the year. During her absence, her animals were neglected and suffered greatly. The Kenya Society for the Protection and Care of Animals obtained a custody order and removed the animals to the Nanyuki sports center.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant was guilty of cruelty to animals under section 3(1) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act
  2. Whether the appellant abandoned animals under section 3(1)(e) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act
  3. Whether the appellant failed to procure veterinary treatment for an animal under section 3(1)(f) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act
  4. Whether the appellant kept animals in a verminous condition under section 3(1)(f) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act

Reasoning

The prosecution proved that the sufferings of the appellant's animals arose without sufficient cause or without reasonable cause or excuse on the part of the appellant, which cause or excuse would be necessary to exonerate her from her primary responsibility as owner.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act
  • Criminal Procedure Code
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case