SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Karuru Munyororo v Joseph Ndumia Murage [1988] KECA 84 (KLR)

[1988] KECA 84 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
84
Citation
[1988] KECA 84 (KLR)
Decided
21 March 1988
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the decision of the High Court in NyeriCoramJ.O Nyarangi, J.M Gachuhi, H.G Platt
Holding

The consent to subdivide and sell the land was not valid as it was given after the three-month period set by the Land Control Act had expired.

Facts

The appellant Karuru Munyororo owed Kshs 12,800.75 to the Settlement Fund Trustees. He agreed to sell four acres of land for Kshs 21,000 to the respondent Joseph Ndumia Murage. The appellant paid a deposit of Kshs 1,575 and the respondent paid Kshs 12,800.75 to clear the debt. The consent to subdivide and sell the land was given on September 9, 1980, after the three-month period set by the Land Control Act had expired.

Issues

  1. Whether the consent to subdivide and sell the land was valid
  2. Whether the Land Control Act was applicable to the transaction

Reasoning

The consent was given on September 9, 1980, which was after the three-month period set by the Land Control Act had expired. The Land Control Act does not provide for any period of disability which may be excluded.

Outcome

The appeal is allowed with costs.

Orders

  • The consent to subdivide and sell the land is null and void.
  • The respondent can claim whatever money he had paid as provided by section 7 of the Land Control Act (cap 302).

Remedies

  • Refund of the amount paid by the respondent

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Land Control Act (cap 302)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case