SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Lusenaka & another v Omocha (Civil Appeal 134 of 1993) [1994] KECA 101 (KLR) (1 December 1994) (Judgment)

[1994] KECA 101 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
101
Citation
[1994] KECA 101 (KLR)
Decided
1 December 1994
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment and decree of the High Court of Kenya at KakamegaCoramR. S. C. Omo-lo, A. M. Akwumi, P. K. Tunoi
Holding

The 1st appellant's title to the land was extinguished by Nathan Omocha's adverse possession. The 2nd appellant's claim was dismissed as he was an innocent purchaser for value.

Facts

In 1964, Eliud Nyongesa was allocated plot No 204 at Kamakoiwa Settlement Scheme in Bungoma district. The 1st appellant, Eliud Nyongesa, was unable to pay for the plot and asked Nathan Omocha to pay the fees and take over the plot. Nathan Omocha paid Shs 302 as deposit and Shs 102 to the 1st appellant. Nathan Omocha claimed adverse possession and title to the plot from 1964 to 1987. In 1987, Nathan Omocha brought two suits in Kakamega and Eldoret, claiming adverse possession and title to the plot.

Issues

  1. Whether Nathan Omocha acquired title to the plot through adverse possession.
  2. Whether the 2nd appellant, Onesmus Muchai Waweru, acquired title to the land through the 1st appellant's sale agreement.

Reasoning

The court held that land owned by the Settlement Fund Trustees (SFT) is not land owned by the Government. The 1st appellant's title was extinguished by Nathan Omocha's adverse possession. The 2nd appellant's claim was dismissed as he was an innocent purchaser for value.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Agriculture Act cap 318 of the Laws of Kenya
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (3)
  • Boniface Oredo v Wabomba Mukile Civil Appeal No 170 of 1989 (unreported)
  • section 167(1) of the Agriculture Act
  • section 175 of the Agriculture Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case