SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mary Wahito (A minor suing thru' next friend Gladys Wairimu Waiguru ) & another v Kenya Posts & Telecommunications Corporation & another [1997] KECA 167 (KLR)

[1997] KECA 167 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
167
Citation
[1997] KECA 167 (KLR)
Decided
11 December 1997
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a Judgment and Decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nyeri (Justice Ang'awa) dated the 27th June, 1994CoramJ. E. Gicheru, P. K. Tuni, G. S. Pall
Holding

The suit is not time-barred under Section 109 of the Act as the negligent act occurred in the execution of a public duty. The order extending the time to institute the suit is invalid.

Facts

The second respondent was employed by the first respondent as a driver. On January 1, 1991, he was instructed to drive the first respondent's vehicle from Nyeri to Mukurwe-ini to deliver engineering equipment for the installation of STD exchange line. An accident occurred during the journey.

Issues

  1. Whether the suit was time-barred under Section 109 of the Kenya Posts and Telecommunications Corporation Act
  2. Whether the trial court erred in granting an order extending the time to institute the suit

Reasoning

The court held that the negligent act was in the execution of a public duty and thus protected by Section 109 of the Act. The trial court's order extending the time to institute the suit was invalid as it was granted ex parte.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Kenya Posts and Telecommunications Corporation Act Cap 411 Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (2)
  • Stanley Kigara Kagombe vs Michael Maina & Another Nairobi H.C.C.C. NO. 3762 of 1993 (unreported)
  • HALSBURY'S LAWS OF ENGLAND Vol.28 paragraph 601
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case