SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Caneland Limited v Commissioner of Lands 5 others [1998] KECA 217 (KLR)

[1998] KECA 217 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
217
Citation
[1998] KECA 217 (KLR)
Decided
16 December 1998
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of execution in an intended appeal from an order of the High CourtCoramR. O. KWACH, P. K. TUNOI, A. B. SHAH
Holding

The ruling of the learned Judge cannot be faulted as far as his observations of sections 27 and 28 of the Registered Land Act are concerned. The applicant's intended appeal will not have arguable grounds of appeal.

Facts

The applicant, Caneland Limited, claimed a letter of allotment dated 1979 for a property now known as Kisumu Municipality Block 6/461. The 1st respondent, Commissioner of Lands, allocated the property to 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th respondents who transferred it to the 6th respondent, who is now the registered proprietor.

Issues

  1. Whether the learned Judge's ruling on the Registered Land Act can be faulted
  2. Whether the applicant's intended appeal has arguable grounds

Reasoning

The learned Judge's ruling was based on the provisions of section 28 of the Registered Land Act, which states that the rights of the registered owner cannot be defeated by misconceived equitable rights of a stranger. The applicant's letter of allotment was not perfected into a title, and the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th respondents obtained another letter of allotment and transferred title to the 6th respondent.

Outcome

The application for stay of execution of the order by which the learned Judge struck out the applicant's suit in the superior court is dismissed with costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Registered Land Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case