SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

GEOFFREY NJOROGE KINYANJUI vs NYAUTHA GICHUNGU [1999] KECA 151 (KLR)

[1999] KECA 151 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
151
Citation
[1999] KECA 151 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for extension of time to file a Notice of AppealCoramA.A. LAKHA
Holding

The court grants the application and orders that the applicant shall file his notice of appeal within seven days from the date of the judgment and the record of appeal within fifteen days thereafter.

Facts

The respondent was the unsuccessful defendant in the Senior Resident Magistrate's Court at Kiambu, where judgment was entered on 9 November, 1992. The appeal from that judgment was struck out as incompetent due to an omission in the record of appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the time for filing the notice of appeal and record of appeal should be extended.
  2. Whether the failure to include the document in the record was a mistake and not a bar to obtaining an extension of time.

Reasoning

The court finds that the applicant's mistake was not intentional and that the question of jurisdiction can be raised on a second appeal. The court exercises its discretion in favor of the applicant, balancing the principle of ending litigation with the need to investigate and decide disputes on their merits.

Outcome

The application is granted.

Orders

  • The applicant shall file his notice of appeal within seven days from the date of the judgment.
  • The applicant shall file his record of appeal within fifteen days thereafter.

Remedies

  • The applicant shall pay the respondent the costs of the application in any event.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • BELINDA MURAI AND NINE OTHERS VS. AMOS WAINAINA
  • GICHUHI KIMIRA V. SAMUEL NGUNU KIMOTHO AND ANOTHER
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case