SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

1. PHILIP WAMACHO CHEMIATI) 2. PAUL WEPUKHULU CHEMIATI) vsNATHAN WEKESA NAKITARE [1999] KECA 155 (KLR)

[1999] KECA 155 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
155
Citation
[1999] KECA 155 (KLR)
Decided
24 February 1999
Parties
raw
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for extension of time for filing the notice of appeal and record of appealCoramTUNOI, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS)
Holding

The application is stood over to the next sessions at Nakuru. The applicants are granted leave to make a reply to the replying affidavit should they deem it necessary. The respondent shall avail legible copies of the replying affidavit. The costs of this adjournment to abide the results of the application.

Facts

The application was for an extension of time to file the notice of appeal and record of appeal against the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Eldoret (Aganyanya, J) dated 10th September, 1990.

Issues

  1. Extension of time for filing the notice of appeal and record of appeal
  2. Leave to make a reply to the replying affidavit

Reasoning

The application was considered and the court decided to stand it over to the next sessions at Nakuru, granting leave to the applicants to make a reply to the replying affidavit and requiring the respondent to provide legible copies of the replying affidavit.

Outcome

The application is stood over to the next sessions at Nakuru.

Orders

  • The application is stood over to the next sessions at Nakuru
  • The applicants are granted leave to make a reply to the replying affidavit should they deem it necessary
  • The respondent shall avail legible copies of the replying affidavit
  • The costs of this adjournment to abide the results of the application
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case