Ouma v Republic (Criminal Appeal 33 of 1999) [1999] KECA 205 (KLR) (17 June 1999) (Judgment)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- 205
- Citation
- [1999] KECA 205 (KLR)
- Decided
- 17 June 1999
The conviction for rape is set aside, and the appellant is convicted for indecent assault on each count. The sentences are reduced to five years imprisonment with hard labour and ten strokes of the cane on each count, to run consecutively.
Facts
The appellant was charged with two counts of rape, but the particulars did not include the words 'without her consent'. He pleaded guilty and was convicted and sentenced.
Issues
- Whether the Magistrate erred in convicting the appellant on a plea which was not unequivocal.
- Whether the sentences were excessive and manifestly harsh.
- Whether the learned Judge had jurisdiction to dismiss the appeal summarily.
Reasoning
The particulars of the charge of rape were defective as they did not include the essential ingredient 'without her consent'. The appellant's plea was not an unequivocal plea of guilty to a proper charge under section 140 of the Penal Code. However, the facts admitted constituted an unequivocal admission of indecent assault.
Outcome
Appeal successful
Orders
- Conviction for rape set aside
- Conviction for indecent assault on each count substituted
- Sentences reduced to five years imprisonment with hard labour and ten strokes of the cane on each count, to run consecutively
Authorities cited
Legislation (3)
- Criminal Procedure Code
- Penal Code
- Employment Ordinance
Cases cited (2)
- Young Charles Okang v Republic (1982-88) 1 KAR 276
- Elian Ngugi v Republic [1959] EA 984
Loading judgment…