SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

TONONOKA STEELS LIMITED v EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICATRADE AND DEVELOPMENT BANK [1999] KECA 3 (KLR)

[1999] KECA 3 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
3
Citation
[1999] KECA 3 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the High Court of KenyaCoramP.K. TUNOI, Lakha JA
Holding

The appeal succeeds, and the High Court of Kenya has jurisdiction over the dispute.

Facts

The appellant, Tononoka Steels Limited, sought a loan from the respondent, the Eastern and Southern Africa Trade and Development Bank, to finance a steel manufacturing project in Kenya. The loan agreements were governed by English law, and the High Court had jurisdiction over the dispute.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court of Kenya has jurisdiction over the dispute
  2. Whether the clause in the loan agreements that disputes should be judged by the tribunals of a particular country is binding

Reasoning

The court held that the clause in the loan agreements is not binding and that the right of access to the courts of Kenya may only be taken away by clear and unambiguous words of the Parliament of Kenya.

Outcome

Appeal Succeeds

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Feihmarn, The [1957] 2 Lloyd's Rep 551
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case