Julius Muthoka Ndolo & 4 others v Danson Mutuku Muema [2000] KECA 66 (KLR)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- 66
- Citation
- [2000] KECA 66 (KLR)
- Decided
- 22 December 2000
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplicants seek an extension of time to file and serve Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal.CoramE. O. O'KUBASU
Holding
The application for extension of time is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Facts
The applicants failed to file their Notice of Appeal within the prescribed time frame, citing their counsel's advice as the reason for the delay.
Issues
- Whether the court should grant an extension of time for filing the Notice of Appeal.
- The discretion of the court in deciding whether to grant an extension of time.
Reasoning
The court found the delay unreasonable and unreasonable, considering the length of the delay and the reasons provided by the applicants.
Outcome
The application is dismissed.
Orders
- Application for extension of time is dismissed.
- Costs are awarded to the respondent.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…