SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Commissioner General, Kenya Revenue Authority through Republic v Silvano Onema Owaki t/a Marenga Filling Station [2001] KECA 34 (KLR)

[2001] KECA 34 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
34
Citation
[2001] KECA 34 (KLR)
Decided
21 December 2001
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the High Court rulingCoramR. S. OMOLO, A. A. LAKHA, M. Ole KEIWUA
Holding

The appeal is allowed with costs, and the order of the superior court dated August 18, 1999 is hereby set aside.

Facts

The applicant applied for leave to make an application for orders of certiorari and mandamus against a seizure notice issued by the Kenya Revenue Authority. The applicant alleged that the seizure was malicious and without his being given an opportunity to be heard.

Issues

  1. Whether the superior court had jurisdiction to hear the application for judicial review
  2. Whether the applicant was denied justice due to the lack of an affidavit detailing the procedure used to detect the offence committed

Reasoning

The court found that the application for leave was not properly grounded and that the superior court had not availed an affidavit detailing the procedure used to detect the offence committed. The court concluded that the denial of justice was due to the lack of an affidavit.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • The order of the superior court dated August 18, 1999 is hereby set aside with costs to the appellant

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Customs and Excise Act (CAP. 472)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (2)
  • R. v. Wandsworth JJ., ex p. Read [1942] 1 K. B. 281
  • Supreme Court Practice 1976 Vol. 1 at paragraph 53/1/7
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case