SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Commercial Bank v Charles Otiso Otundo [2002] KECA 190 (KLR)

[2002] KECA 190 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
190
Citation
[2002] KECA 190 (KLR)
Decided
20 June 2002
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the High Court's decreeCoramR. S. C. OMOLO, A.B. SHAH, M. Ole KEIWUA
Holding

The application to have the appeal struck out is misconceived and dismissed with costs.

Facts

The appellant, Kenya Commercial Bank, appealed against a decree from the High Court of Kenya at Kisii. The respondent, Charles Otiso Otundo, had filed an application to have the appeal struck out on various grounds.

Issues

  1. The appeal was filed out of time without leave
  2. Essential step has not been taken in the proceedings
  3. The certificate of delay is defective
  4. The letter bespeaking copies of proceedings and ruling appealed against is not in the record of appeal

Reasoning

The court found that the appellant's advocates received the requisite copies of proceedings and ruling on 12th April, 2000, and the appeal was filed in time. The certificate of delay was correctly set out, and the letter bespeaking copies of proceedings and ruling was not required to be included in the record of appeal.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Application to have the appeal struck out is misconceived and dismissed with costs
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case