SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mbui Mukangu v Gerald Mutwiri Mbui [2004] KECA 155 (KLR)

[2004] KECA 155 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
155
Citation
[2004] KECA 155 (KLR)
Decided
10 December 2004
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment and decree of the High Court of Kenya at Meru (Omwitsa, Comm. Of Assize) dated 3rd August, 2000 H.C.C.C. NO. 59 OF 1999CoramO’KUBASU, GITHINJI, WAKI
Holding

Sections 27 and 28 of the Registered Land Act do not confer rights on Mbui to evict Gerald from the land.

Facts

The dispute involves two parcels of land, plot 1245 and plot 214, registered under the Registered Land Act. Gerald Mutwiri Mbui (Gerald) sued his father, Mbui Mukangu (Mbui), in Meru C.M.C.C. NO. 870 OF 1993 to stop him from alienating the land and to force him to transfer portions to Gerald. Mbui later sued Gerald for threatening to harm him and cutting down his banana plants. Gerald claims ancestral land rights, while Mbui claims the land is his personal property.

Issues

  1. Do sections 27 and 28 of the Registered Land Act confer such rights on Mbui as will entitle him to evict his son, Gerald, from the occupation and possession of the land?

Reasoning

The court found that Gerald's claim is based on customary law rights, but these are excluded under sections 27, 28, and 30 of the Registered Land Act. The court held that as the registered owner, Mbui may not be urged, directed, or compelled to share the land in any particular manner.

Outcome

Affirmed the High Court's judgment.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Registered Land Act (Cap 300, Laws of Kenya)
Cases cited (3)
  • Nyeri C.A. No. 189/96 MURIUKI MARIGI v RICHARD MARIGI MURIUKI & 2 others (UR)
  • Obiero -vs- Opiyo & others [1972] EA 227
  • Esiroyo -vs- Esiroyo & another [1973] EA 388
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case