SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Najib Balala & 13 others v David M Githere & 9 others [2005] KECA 139 (KLR)

[2005] KECA 139 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
139
Citation
[2005] KECA 139 (KLR)
Decided
16 September 2005
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of execution pending appealCoramABDALL MIRA, Ag., DEVERELL, Maraga, Mwera
The application is misconceived as the decision is not capable of execution. However, an order of stay of execution is granted to recover taxed costs and additional costs pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.

Facts

KNCCI dissolved the management committee of its Mombasa Branch and appointed a task force committee. The applicants filed a Judicial Review application seeking to quash the decision, but the application was set aside with costs. The applicants then filed a bill of costs for instruction fees, which was taxed, and objected to the amount. The applicants sought a stay of execution pending the objection, which was granted ex parte.

Issues

  • Whether the application for stay of execution is misconceived
  • Whether the applicants' intended appeal is arguable and likely to be rendered nugatory if the order of stay is not granted

Reasoning

The court found the application for stay of execution misconceived as the decision is not capable of execution. However, in the interest of justice, an order of stay of execution is granted to recover taxed costs and additional costs pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.

Outcome

The application for stay of execution is granted.

Orders

  • Order of stay of execution to recover taxed costs and additional costs pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal

Remedies

  • Stay of execution of taxed costs and additional costs
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case