SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kuwinda Rurinja Co. Ltd v Kuwinda Holdings Ltd. & 13 others [2010] KECA 13 (KLR)

[2010] KECA 13 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
13
Citation
[2010] KECA 13 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for injunction pending the hearing and determination of the pending appealCoramP. K. TUNOI, E.O. O’KUBASU, E.M. GITHINJI
Holding

The application for injunction is refused, but the status quo is maintained until the final determination of the appeal.

Facts

The applicant, Kuwinda Rurinja Co. Ltd., seeks an injunction against the 1st and 2nd respondents to prevent them from alienating, transferring, sub-dividing, or developing the subject matter of the appeal, LR No. 10262/2, pending the hearing and determination of Civil Appeal No. 8 of 2003.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's appeal is arguable
  2. Whether the injunction sought is necessary to prevent the respondents from sub-dividing and developing the subject matter of the appeal
  3. Whether the injunction will render the appeal nugatory

Reasoning

The Court finds the applicant's appeal arguable and upholds the overriding objective of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act to facilitate the just, expeditious, proportionate, and affordable resolution of appeals. The Court orders the status quo to be maintained until the final determination of the appeal.

Outcome

The application for injunction is refused.

Orders

  • The status quo is maintained until the final determination of the appeal.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Appellate Jurisdiction Act (Cap. 9 Laws of Kenya)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case