SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

George Gitau Wainaina v Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd & 2 others [2010] KECA 241 (KLR)

[2010] KECA 241 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
241
Citation
[2010] KECA 241 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of execution of the ruling and order of the High Court of KenyaCoramR. S. C. Omo-lo, E. O. O'Kubasu, D. K. S. Aganyanya
Holding

The Court grants the order sought in prayer 2 of the application, directing that the status quo be maintained until the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.

Facts

The applicant, George Gitau Wainaina, filed a suit against the respondents, Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd, Ephraim Wambu Miano, and A. M. Macharia, seeking various declarations and orders. The suit was dismissed by the High Court, and the applicant intends to appeal the dismissal.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's intended appeal is arguable and not frivolous.
  2. Whether the stay of execution of the ruling and all consequential orders is necessary.
  3. Whether a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from selling the land is necessary.
  4. Whether the applicant will suffer irreparable loss if the orders are not granted.

Reasoning

The Court finds that the applicant has shown an arguable appeal and that the intended appeal is not frivolous. The Court grants a temporary injunction to prevent the respondents from selling the land pending the appeal.

Outcome

The application is granted.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the ruling and all consequential orders pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
  • Temporary injunction restraining the respondents from selling the land Kajiado/Kaputiei-North/4302 pending the appeal.

Remedies

  • Temporary injunction to prevent the respondents from selling the land Kajiado/Kaputiei-North/4302 pending the appeal.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case