SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Board Of Governors, Moi High School, Kabarak & another v Malcolm Bell [2013] KECA 13 (KLR)

[2013] KECA 13 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
13
Citation
[2013] KECA 13 (KLR)
Decided
22 February 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication for leave to appeal to the Supreme CourtCoramD.K. Maraga, D.K. Musinga, F. Sichahe
Holding

The applicants are granted leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Facts

The respondent filed a suit in the High Court against Hon. Daniel Toroitich Arap Moi seeking to recover the suit piece of land. The respondents claim the land was given to Moi by his late father, Walter Bel, while the applicants claim the land was given to Moi by the School.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicants have jurisdiction to certify that the proposed appeal to the Supreme Court is a matter of utmost public importance.
  2. Whether the law relating to adverse possession of agricultural land in possession of the school since 1981 needs to be properly canvassed.
  3. Whether there is a likelihood of miscarriage of justice if the appeal is not heard.

Reasoning

The Court finds that the matter should be considered by the Supreme Court and the law clarified due to the importance of agricultural land in the country. There is uncertainty regarding the legal status of the school and the timing of adverse possession.

Outcome

Leave to appeal granted

Orders

  • The applicants shall file a notice of appeal within fourteen days of the date hereof and serve it as provided under Rule 31.
  • The costs of this application shall abide the outcome of the intended appeal.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Erinford Properties Ltd v Cheshire County Council (1974) 1 ALL ER 448
  • Joseph Mutafari Situma v. Nicholas Makhanu Cherongo
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case