SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Josephine Wairimu Githinji v Lucy Wanjiru Murimi [2013] KECA 215 (KLR)

[2013] KECA 215 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
215
Citation
[2013] KECA 215 (KLR)
Decided
10 October 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for leave to appeal out of timeCoramM. K. KOOME
Holding

The court dismissed the applicant's application for extension of time to file an appeal out of time, finding that the delay of over 9 years was inordinate and not satisfactorily explained.

Facts

The applicant, Josephine Wairimu Githinji, sought an extension of time to file and serve the record of appeal against the ruling of Khamoni, J. on 30th July, 2004, dismissing her Chamber Summons dated 6th April, 2004, with costs. The applicant was seeking for two principal orders: a stay of execution of the orders by the Principal Magistrate pending the hearing and final determination of an appeal, and maintenance of the status quo as at 30th September, 2003, pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's application for extension of time to file an appeal is merited
  2. Whether the applicant's delay in filing the appeal is inordinate and without a satisfactory explanation

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the appeal was inordinate and not satisfactorily explained. The court also noted that the applicant had a duty to visit the court registry to enquire whether an appeal was filed.

Outcome

Denied

Orders

  • The application for extension of time to file an appeal out of time was denied

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Wasike v Swala 1984 KLR 591
  • Mutiso v Mwangi Civil Application No. Nai. 255 of 1997 (UR)
  • Mwangi v Kenya Airways Ltd. [2003] KLR 486
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case