SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Case Trading Company Limited v Vishak Builders Limited & another [2013] KECA 338 (KLR)

[2013] KECA 338 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
338
Citation
[2013] KECA 338 (KLR)
Decided
19 April 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of execution and proceedings pending the filing, hearing and final determination of an intended appealCoramW. KARANJA, W. OUKO, J. MOHAMMED
Holding

The court declined to grant an order for stay of execution and stay of proceedings pending the filing and final determination of the intended appeal.

Facts

The 1st respondent filed a suit in the High Court against the applicant for breach of contract, alleging that the applicant failed to pay costs as and when they fell due under an agreement. The 1st respondent claimed KShs.17,940,979.81, together with interest, for breach of contract. The applicant filed a defence and counterclaim.

Issues

  1. Whether there was a breach of contract as alleged
  2. Whether injunctive orders could issue in this matter
  3. Whether security for the claim could issue

Reasoning

The court held that the intended appeal is arguable but has not been rendered nugatory by the applicant's failure to demonstrate that the appeal will be rendered nugatory if the application is dismissed.

Outcome

Application dismissed with costs to the 1st respondent.

Orders

  • Order for stay of execution and stay of proceedings pending the filing and final determination of the intended appeal declined

Remedies

  • Costs to the 1st respondent

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • RELIANCE BANK LTD V NORLAKE INVESTMENTS LIMITED
  • ORARO AND RACHIER ADVOCATES V CO-OPERATIVE BANK OF KENYA LIMITED
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case