SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ephantus Wachira Ngochi v Edward Njoroge Mwangi [2013] KECA 416 (KLR)

[2013] KECA 416 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
416
Citation
[2013] KECA 416 (KLR)
Decided
25 July 2013
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAppealPostureApplication for extension of time to file notice and record of appealCoramALNASHIR VISRAM
Holding

The application is allowed, and the notice of appeal shall be filed and served within the next seven days, and the record shall be filed and served within the next 14 days, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed.

Facts

The applicant's advocate was not informed of the final date the ruling of the High Court would be delivered. The ruling was initially set for delivery on 19th February, 2013, adjourned again to 28th February, 2013, and eventually read on 19th March, 2013 in the absence of the applicant.

Issues

  1. Whether the delay in bringing the application for extension of time is inordinate and properly explained.
  2. Whether the application is an abuse of the court process.

Reasoning

The delay in bringing the application is not inordinate and is well explained. The court has discretion to grant an extension of time, considering the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, and the chances of the appeal succeeding.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Notice of appeal to be filed and served within the next seven days.
  • Record to be filed and served within the next 14 days.

Remedies

  • Extension of time to file notice and record of appeal

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Leo Sila Mutiso vs. Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi – Civil Application No. NAI. 251 of 1997
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case