SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

East African Portland Cement Company Limited v Superior Homes (Kenya) Limited [2014] KECA 210 (KLR)

[2014] KECA 210 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
210
Citation
[2014] KECA 210 (KLR)
Decided
28 November 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for stay of execution of orders pending appealCoramC.B. Madan, Cotton L., L., Lindley L., MURGOR, Megarry, Nyamweya
Holding

The Court granted a stay of execution of the orders pending the filing of the appeal.

Facts

The applicant, East African Portland Cement Company Limited, entered into an agreement with the respondent, Superior Homes (Kenya) Limited, to purchase 337 acres of land at Athi River. The respondent raised concerns about the land's title and sought indemnity from the applicant.

Issues

  1. Whether the appeal is arguable
  2. Whether the appeal would be rendered nugatory if the stay is not granted

Reasoning

The Court found that the appeal was arguable and that it would be rendered nugatory if the stay was not granted. The Court also considered the special circumstances of the case, including the large amount of rent in dispute.

Outcome

The application was granted.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the orders issued by the Honourable Lady Justice Nyamweya

Remedies

  • Costs to be provided for

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • Joseph Gitahi Gachau & Another v. Pioneer Holdings Ltd & 2 Others (Civil Appeal No. Nai 124 of 2008)
  • M. M. Butt v. The Rent Restriction Tribunal (Civil Application No. Nai 6 of 1979)
  • Nairobi Deluxe Service Ltd v. Eric Onyango Ndege (Civil Application No Nai 64 of 1992)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case