SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Japheth Natse Ifedha v Collindale Security Company Limited [2014] KECA 299 (KLR)

[2014] KECA 299 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
299
Citation
[2014] KECA 299 (KLR)
Decided
24 October 2014
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypecivilPostureAppeal from a decision of the High CourtCoramJ. MOHAMMED, K. M'INOTI, S. GATEMBU KAIRU
Holding

The appeal has no merit and is hereby dismissed with costs.

Facts

The appellant, Japheth Natse Ifedha, sued his former employer, Collindale Security Company Limited, in the Chief Magistrate's Court at Milimani, Nairobi, seeking general damages for pain and suffering and loss of amenities, general damages for breach of contract, special damages, exemplary damages for inhuman conduct, costs of the suit, and interest from the respondent in respect of injuries sustained in the course of his employment.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial court erred in law by failing to address the question of negligence on the basis of the pleadings and the evidence.
  2. Whether the trial court made findings of fact on the basis of hearsay evidence and a departure from the pleadings.
  3. Whether the trial court failed to make a finding as to quantum of damages payable.
  4. Whether the trial court failed to address the legal basis for a claim in exemplary damages and in making findings of law based on the legal doctrine of volenti-non-fit injuria which was neither pleaded nor arose in the course of evidence or proceedings.

Reasoning

The Court found that the respondent discharged its duty of reasonable care to the appellant and that the claim in negligence has not been established on a balance of probability.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed with costs

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • KENYA BREWERIES LTD V GODFREY ODOYO
  • MWANYULE V SAID t/a JOMVU TOTAL SERVICE STATION
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case