SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Jane Wanja Gahiengo v David Wanjohi Kamau & another [2014] KECA 677 (KLR)

[2014] KECA 677 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
677
Citation
[2014] KECA 677 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the judgment of the High Court of Kenya at NakuruCoramALNASHIR VISRAM, MARTHA KOOME, J. OTIENO-ODEK
Holding

We find no merit in the appeal and dismiss it with costs to the respondents.

Facts

The deceased persons, Duncan Kamau Kimani, Ethan Kaguanyo, and Gachiengo Gichuhi formed a partnership and purchased shares in Nakuru Taifa Hotel in 1963. After their deaths, the hotel was dissolved and its assets were distributed. The appellant, as the legal representative of Gachiengo Gichuhi's estate, was allotted Nakuru Municipality/Block 13/166 absolutely and Nakuru Municipality/Block 10/19 jointly with Felista Wanini Theuri. The respondents claimed the appellant held the suit properties in trust for them.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant held the suit properties in trust for the respondents.
  2. Whether the trial court erred in ordering the appellant to pay the respondents rental income.

Reasoning

The appellant admitted receiving rent from the suit properties. The trial court's order to pay rental income was upheld as the appellant's portion was clearly identifiable.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed with costs to the respondents.

Orders

  • Compelling the appellant to pay the respondents Kshs.188,000/= and Kshs. 940,000/= each in respect of rent collected from Nakuru Municipality/ Block 13/166 and a portion of Nakuru Municipality/Block 10/19 respectively.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Mworia & Another -vs- Kiambati (supra)
  • J.K Kinoti -vs- G.J. Kibanga – Civil Appeal No. 343 of 2010
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case