Equip Agencies Limited v Akber Abdullahi Kassam Esmail & 4 others [2014] KECA 98 (KLR)
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Case number
- 98
- Citation
- [2014] KECA 98 (KLR)
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of KenyaCoramP. O. KIAGE
Holding
The application for leave to appeal is not urgent.
Facts
The applicants sought to appeal a judgment declaring an ex-parte injunction excess of fourteen days a nullity and void. The respondents had not moved to attach or advertise the applicant's goods.
Issues
- Whether the application for leave to appeal is urgent.
- Whether the judgment declaring the ex-parte injunction a nullity and void is final and conclusive.
Reasoning
The court found no imminent threat to the applicant's interests and that the application was not deserving of the tag of urgency. The delay in filing the application was noted, and the court declined to certify the motion as urgent.
Outcome
The application for leave to appeal is denied.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is denied.
- Costs are awarded to the respondents.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…