SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

James Nyasimi Kiana v David Nankone Mboa [2016] KECA 39 (KLR)

[2016] KECA 39 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
39
Citation
[2016] KECA 39 (KLR)
Decided
16 December 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplication for extension of time to file and serve an Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal out of timeCoramA.K. MURGOR
Holding

The application for extension of time to file and serve a Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Facts

The applicant, James Nyasimbi Kiana, applied for an extension of time to file and serve a Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal due to delays in filing the appeal. The judgment was delivered on 31st October 2014, and the applicant's former counsel informed him of the decision in mid-May 2015. The applicant then instructed a new firm to file the appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether to grant the extension of time to file and serve a Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal
  2. Whether the applicant's former counsel's failure to file the appeal should be visited upon the applicant

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant did not file an application to validate the existing notice of appeal, which has rendered the application incompetent. The court also noted that the grounds for appeal do not raise discernable complaints and are unlikely to succeed.

Outcome

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 25th April 2014 is dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Leo Sila Mutiso v. Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi
  • Ocean Freight Shipping Company Limited v. Oakdale Commodities Limited
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case