SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kenya Agricultural Research Institute v Farah Ali, Chairman Isahakia Self Help Group (sued on his own behalf and on behalf of the members of the group & Commissioner of Lands (Civil Application 18 of 2016) [2016] KECA 647 (KLR) (Civ) (15 April 2016) (Ruling)

[2016] KECA 647 (KLR) Court of Appeal
Read PDF
Court
Court of Appeal
Case number
647
Citation
[2016] KECA 647 (KLR)
Decided
15 April 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplication for stay of proceedings and conservatory orderCoramAZANGALALA, Mulwa, Munyao, Waithaka, Wendoh
Holding

The application must fail as the applicant has not demonstrated that if the stay is not granted its intended appeal will be rendered nugatory.

Facts

The dispute involves portions of land known as L.R. No. 5210 and L.R. No. 5211 in Naivasha, Nakuru County. The applicant, Kenya Agricultural & Livestock Research Organization, seeks a stay of proceedings and a conservatory order against the 1st respondent, Farah Ali, Chairman Isahakia Self Help Group, and the 2nd respondent, Commissioner of Lands.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant has an arguable appeal
  2. Whether the intended appeal, if successful, would be rendered nugatory if the stay or injunction is not granted

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant has not met the second limb of Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court's Rules, which requires that the intended appeal, if successful, would be rendered nugatory unless the stay or injunction is granted.

Outcome

The application is dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court's Rules
Cases cited (4)
  • Permanent Secretary Ministry of Roads & Another vs Fleur Investments Limited
  • Mumias Sugar Company Ltd. vs Mumias Outgrowers Company
  • Silverstein vs Atsango
  • Standard Limited & 2 Others vs Wilson Kalya & Another t/a Kalya & Co. Advocates
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case